In-Vehicle Cell Phone Use - Assessing Accident Risk

Mobile phone use in motor vehicles has increasedof the ongoing research for, and by, the National
at a remarkable rate over the past 15 years. YetHighway Traffic Safety Administration ( we should
it is undeniable that utilizing a cell phone whileat least consider their policy on using cell phones
driving can affect driver performance as it relateswhile driving that states "The primary
to the overall safe operation of a vehicle. Thereresponsibility of the driver is to operate a motor
are a number of things to consider in decidingvehicle safely. The task of driving requires full
whether the trade off in convenience is worth theattention and focus. Cell phone use can distract
potential risks associated with the distractiondrivers from this task, risking harm to themselves
created by a cell phone. Given the fact that theand others. Therefore, the safest course of
individual driver (and/or business owner) ultimatelyaction is to refrain from using a cell phone while
pays for the resulting consequences associateddriving."Source: Cellular Telecommunications &
with an auto or truck accident (financial, emotionalInternet Association (CTIA)According to the
and physical lose); it is prudent to seek outCTIA, there are currently more than 218 million
relevant and reliable information in making asubscribed cell phone users as of August 2006
decision. In doing so, consider the source, as well(compared to some 4.3 million in 1990). Based on
as the possible motivation behind the informationthe extraordinary growth of cellular phone
provider.Source: US LegislationIn the Unitedindustry and the CTIA's advisory role, it may be
States, there are currently no federal lawsof value to think about their point of view on this
prohibiting driving while using a cell phone. In antopic. In doing so, you might consider a document
earnest attempt to find a solution, some statesfound on the CTIA's web site, entitled
(New Jersey, New York, the District of Columbia,"SafeDrivingTalkingPoints2" (created June 6, 2006)
Connecticut and pending in California) have passedthat states "But for some reason, legislative
laws barring hand-held cell phone use while driving.efforts to prevent driver distractions have been
Typical fines range from $50 to $100 for driversnarrowly focused on wireless phone use.
caught using a hand-held device. While theseAccording to government statistics and respected
lawmakers have the public's best interest at heartresearch studies, this approach is well off point."
by levying fines, not all entities weighing in on thisConsider that, there are more than 220 million
subject are likely to have the samevehicles on the road and a similar number of cell
incentive.Source: Manufacturer ResearchAs thephones subscribers. Based on the amount of time
result of an independent study (found on theircustomers might potentially spend using their cell
web site in the form of a press release),phones in vehicles, we would hope to find the
Plantronics, a manufacturer of headsets states,CTIA an objective source. Given the magnitude
"71% of drivers steer more accurately whenof the revenue at stake, is a greater degree of
using a headset with a mobile phone". They pointscrutiny in order here? Would the CTIA hold a
out that the study was to discover if a persondifferent position if they were liable, in part, for
using a mobile phone improves driving if he or shedistracted vehicle accidents?Source: Leading
uses a headset. Stephen Wilcox, Ph.D., Principal ofUniversities & Independent ResearchersWhile
Design Science (independent research firm)there are a number of valuable studies on this
states, "Driving with both hands on the wheel issubject, the following are extensive research
the safest option for motorists who use mobileprojects provided by highly accredited
phones, and headsets are tools to enable thatorganizations:1) Virginia Tech Transportation
improvement." Considering the source, is thisInstitute researchers and the National Highway
statement characteristic of scientific research? IsTraffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tracked
it objective and free of marketing bias? Could it100 cars and their drivers for a year; they
confuse individuals into thinking that cell phonesdiscovered that talking on cell phones caused
are safe as long as you are hands-free?more crashes, near-crashes and other incidents
Additionally, found toward the end of the pressthan other distractions (100-Car Naturalistic Driving
release, is a comment by a senior director ofStudy, April 2006).2) University of Utah
product marketing. Beth Johnson states, "It'sresearchers determined that motorists on the
important to keep in mind that our study is notblood-alcohol threshold of being legally drunk were
intended to address the issue of whether or not itable to drive better than sober cell phone using
is safe to talk on a mobile phone while driving, butdrivers. A key researcher and author in this field,
rather what type of technology is safest forPsychology Professor David Strayer notes, "Just
drivers to use while talking on their mobilelike you put yourself and other people at risk
phones". They also state their intent is towhen you drive drunk, you put yourself and
"educate drivers on options for using mobileothers at risk when you use a cell phone and
phones comfortably and responsibly while driving".drive. The level of impairment is very similar."
Given that the goal is safety education, is thisAlso, consider they found motorists to be more
research responsibly comprehensive to consider itaccident-prone and slower to react when talking
a relevant and reliable source?Surely, as you goon cellular telephones. It did not matter if it was
about your own assessment the idea of freeinghands-free either because of "inattention
up both hands to control the steering wheel is ablindness", a syndrome that makes a driver less
logical consideration. If a driver focuses exclusivelyable to process visual information.3) The George
on driving the vehicle, then two hands on theInstitute for International Health (University of
wheel is better than one. Unfortunately, thisSydney, Australia), Insurance Institute for
seemingly sensible approach can lead to a falseHighway Safety (Arlington, Virginia) and Injury
sense of driver security (possibly increasing crashResearch Centre, University of Western Australia
risk) as noted in various reports ( by the Crash(Crawley Australia) jointly presented research
Investigation Team at Virginia Commonwealthentitled "Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle
University Center for Public Safety. Their findingscrashes resulting in hospital attendance: a
illustrated that the cognitive resources required tocase-crossover study". The research consisted of
carry on a phone conversation are equivalent to456 drivers aged 17 years who owned or used
those necessary to drive. This is an importantmobile phones and had been involved in road
concern given VCU's history of transportationcrashes requiring hospital attendance between
safety research, as well as other studiesApril 2002 and July 2004. They concluded that a
concluding this behavior (carrying on a phonedriver who uses a mobile phone (up to 10 minutes
conversation while driving), reduces both driverprior to a crash) has a four times higher likelihood
reaction time and driver attentiveness, especiallyof crashing and an increased likelihood of a crash
as they relate to braking.Unlike a computer,resulting in injury. Using a hands-free phone is not
humans have a limited capacity to processany safer.Eliminate the Risk & Keep the BenefitsIf
simultaneous information. If the software on youryou are the head of a household, a guardian or
computer seems to slow down, you mightthe parent of a less experienced driver, your
consider increasing the memory or processordecision to allow any in-vehicle cell phone use
speed to compensate for delays resulting from ancarries a major emotional and financial risk. If you
overload in computing capacity. We as humansare a fleet manager or you employ individuals that
have a similar limitation when it comes toconduct work-related conversations while driving,
processing too much information, but unlikethe risk of liability for distracted accidents could fall
computers, our resources are somewhat fixed.on you. Strongly consider the legal ramifications
Given the inherent delays in our own thoughtfor the careless operation of an employee-owned
response time when faced with increased loador company-supplied vehicle before deciding to
factors, is it practical or safe to hold a cell phoneignore the inherent danger created by a major
conversation while driving a motor vehicle?Source:cognitive distraction such as a cell phone.Obviously,
Government Transportation Safety ResearchThethere are no easy or certain solutions without
US government employs many of the topsacrifice of convenience. Remember that the
transportation safety experts and funds a majorbenefit of having a cell phone (emergency use
portion of the world's accident preventionand times when you are not operating a vehicle)
research. Given the effects traffic accidents andis not lost just because it remains off while driving.
related congestion have on US productivity,If you consider the facts presented by relevant
accident reduction is a top priority. Consideringand reliable sources, it really is not a matter of a
that distracted driving accounted for at least 6.4trade off after all, but an opportunity to prevent
percent of crash fatalities in 2004 (U.S.an accident or possibly a fatality. In the mean
Department of Transportation), manytime, until it is proven otherwise, think about
researchers are looking closely at the distinguishinginstigating a life saving strategy NOW for the safe
distraction caused by cell phone use in vehicles.use of cell phones - limit yourself, loved ones and
Furthermore, of the many potential distractions inemployees to use (personal and business) only
a vehicle, cell phones are considered equally orwhen the vehicle is in park!Gary S. Rothstein is the
more dangerous than the other knownPresident of Mobile Awareness, a company which
distractions such as eating, reading a map ordesigns and markets vehicle safety products.
grooming while operating a motor vehicle. In light