Wi-Fi Information Guide

Wireless: To Be, Or Not To Be? That Is TheThe Independent newspaper reported that
Question Facing Schools Across The Country.according to some estimates, more than half
There has been a lot of hype in the media aboutEngland's primary schools, and about four-fifths of
concerns wireless Internet connections (Wi-Fi) aretheir secondary schools, have Wi-Fi technology
harming children. But is there a basis to theseinstalled.
concerns, or are these fears unwarranted?In several European countries, provincial
Probably the most concerning information togovernments have banned or limited the use of
come out of these stories is that these wirelesswireless technology in their schools. And back
connections emit radiation with a similar frequencyhome in Britain, Stowe school has removed part
to microwaves and mobile phones. And that factof their Wi-Fi technology after a teacher began
has got people worried that it might cause cancer,having headaches and nausea as soon as it was
brain damage and heart disease, not to mentioninstalled.
headaches, fatigue, nausea, dizziness and memoryHowever there is a chance this teacher was just
problems in the short term."electrosensitive", a condition that affects three
A BBC Panorama investigation caused panic whenout of one hundred people according to the World
they claimed that the radio frequency radiationHealth Organisation.
levels of some classes that have Wi-FiIn addition to this theory, James Rubin from the
connections are up to three times more intenseInstitute of Psychiatry has stated that people can
than the levels found in the main beam ofdevelop headaches if they believe such
intensity of mobile phone masts. However, Thetechnology gives people headaches, even if the
Guardian then quoted various scientists whosignal is not present. What are the advantages
refuted this claim, and essentially discredited theand disadvantages of Wi-Fi Internet Connections?
investigation.Advantages of Wi-Fi
BBC News reported that while the heating effectsThe main advantage of Wi-Fi is users can connect
of high exposure to electromagnetic radiationto the Internet without being plugged in. As long
could be damaging, mobile phones and microwaveas the computers are within range of a host
ovens have a much higher power level thannetwork, users can log on to this network from
wireless connections. The report then pointed outanywhere.
that there is no evidence that suggestsWhat this means is that students can be outside,
electromagnetic radiation at radio frequencies hasor in areas where cables cannot run, and still be
any impact on health when the energy levels areable to use the Internet.
at such low levels. In other words, there is noIn addition, in some circumstances Wi-Fi can be
proof that Wi-Fi connections are bad for ourcheaper to set-up and expand than a cabled
health.network, especially as many Laptop or Notebook
In fact, The Times stated that acomputers now come with inbuilt wireless
wireless-connected classroom in Norwich wastechnology. Disadvantages of Wi-Fi
tested, and the levels of radiation were found toWi-Fi connections can be unreliable, especially when
be 600 times lower than the levels consideredworking at a distance from a base station as the
dangerous by the Government. The classroomsignal strength drops. Technology with similar
was tested using the International Commission'sfrequencies, like mobiles and microwaves, can
NonIonizing Radiation Protection processes, whichdisrupt the connection, which means students
determines how strong radiation is based on howmay be disconnected from the Internet, or at
much heat is produced. Do the negativeleast the speed of the Internet will be greatly
arguments stand-up?minimised.
Despite the articles above, Sir William Stewart,Browsing and downloading speeds can also be
the chairman of the Health Protection Agencymuch slower than a cabled connection simply
who pointed out in 2000 that mobiles phonesbecause the speed of the Wi-Fi device is slower.
could be detrimental to people's health, has beenWi-Fi networks in schools are made to be easy
quoted in a number of newspapers warning offor students to connect to, but by making them
the potential dangers of Wi-Fi technology. He haseasy for the school children to log on, they also
issued a plea that students who come in regularmake it easy for Internet hackers. These hackers
contact with Wi-Fi technology should be monitoredcan put viruses onto the schools network and the
for any ill effects.computers logged onto the network, and they
Labour MP Ian Gibson, who was interviewed bycan also steal information from student's and
Sir William Stewart for an upcoming programme,school computers logged onto the Wi-Fi server.
backed the statements made by Sir WilliamFinally, battery life is minimised because of the
Stewart, and called for an official inquiry into Wi-Fiextra power needed to connect to the network
connections. Gibson is MP for Norwich, a city thatand Internet without cables. Final Verdict
has recently been set up as a wireless city.BBC News reminded the public of Karl Popper,
These sentiments have been echoed by Mike Bell,one of the great philosophers of science, who said
chairman of the Electromagnetic Radiationscience is about falsification. You can prove
Research Trust; Alasdair Philips, director oftheories and hypothesis are incorrect, but you can
Powerwatch, an information service; and thenever prove they are correct. So, theories are
Professional Association of Teachers, whom areinnocent until proven guilty. And with no hard
currently pressuring Education Secretary Alanevidence to suggest wireless technology does
Johnson to call for one such inquiry.negatively affect our health and the health of our
Dr Olle Johansson of Karolinska Institute inchildren, the technology can only be considered
Sweden has been studying radiation similar to thatsafe.
being given off by wireless connections and foundFurther to this, BBC News pointed out that the
there are biological implications. However, when hetelevision and radio modulated frequencies that
was asked if it was right to limit Wi-Fi usagecome into our homes are just as powerful as
based on thermal effect, he refuted the idea.Wi-Fi technology. If the journalists were so
The Government believe the technology isworried about the negative effects of Wi-Fi,
perfectly safe, taking the advice from the Worldshould they also be worried about the effects of
Health Organisation, and have not yet set up anytheir own medium.
official inquiry. Are our children safe?However, the "fact" is that when it comes to
One of the greatest concerns is that of ourchildren many parents and school staff will be
children. Children are more vulnerable to radiationconcerned about the potential effects of the
because their skulls are thinner and their nervous"electronic smog" created by Wi-Fi and will choose
systems are still developing and because they willto play it safe by minimising, or even eliminating,
be exposed to more of this radiation during theirthe use of Wi-Fi within schools until more hard
lives.evidence is available.
Although there is no evidence yet supporting theAnd while there are many other advantages for
notion that wireless connections emit harmfulusing cable technology over wireless (see the
radiation, the thought that children may be'What are the advantages and disadvantages of
exposed to dangerous radiation, especiallyWi-Fi Internet Connections?' section), perhaps
considering how many schools use the technology,schools should be using cabling over wireless
has some parents up in arms.technology even if it is in theory perfectly safe.